On 3/29/19 7:03 AM, Hannes Schmelzer wrote:
Negative phy-addresses can occour if the caller function was not able to
determine a valid phy address (from device-tree for example). In this
case we catch this here and search for ANY phy device on the given mdio-
bus.

Signed-off-by: Hannes Schmelzer <hannes.schmel...@br-automation.com>

---

  drivers/net/phy/phy.c | 3 ++-
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
index 0c8b29d..916b525 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
@@ -922,13 +922,14 @@ struct phy_device *phy_connect(struct mii_dev *bus, int 
addr,
  #endif
  {
        struct phy_device *phydev = NULL;
+       uint mask = (addr > 0) ? (0x1 << addr) : 0xffffffff;
#ifdef CONFIG_PHY_FIXED
        phydev = phy_connect_fixed(bus, dev, interface);
  #endif
if (!phydev)
-               phydev = phy_find_by_mask(bus, 1 << addr, interface);
+               phydev = phy_find_by_mask(bus, mask, interface);
if (phydev)
                phy_connect_dev(phydev, dev);
This fallback is only useful if the board has absolutely no description
of the phy connected to some MAC.
With some drivers, like the MXC_FEC, it is possible to configure
a phy-address within the board header.

In days where DM is more and more used, i would suggest having
a meaningful device-tree which also describes the connected ethernet-phy.

cheers,
Hannes

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to