On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 06:58:31AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 3/27/19 5:40 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > To meet UEFI spec v2.7a section 9.2, we should add
> > EFI_LOADED_IMAGE_DEVICE_PATH_PROTOCOL to image handle,
> > instead of EFI_DEVICE_PATH_PROTOCOL.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.aka...@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  include/efi_api.h                 |  4 ++++
> >  include/efi_loader.h              |  1 +
> >  lib/efi_loader/efi_boottime.c     | 19 ++++++++++++-------
> >  lib/efi_loader/efi_image_loader.c |  2 ++
> >  4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/efi_api.h b/include/efi_api.h
> > index ccf608653d4a..63b703c951a7 100644
> > --- a/include/efi_api.h
> > +++ b/include/efi_api.h
> > @@ -333,6 +333,10 @@ struct efi_system_table {
> >     EFI_GUID(0x5b1b31a1, 0x9562, 0x11d2, \
> >              0x8e, 0x3f, 0x00, 0xa0, 0xc9, 0x69, 0x72, 0x3b)
> >
> > +#define LOADED_IMAGE_DEVICE_PATH_GUID \
> > +   EFI_GUID(0xbc62157e, 0x3e33, 0x4fec, \
> > +            0x99, 0x20, 0x2d, 0x3b, 0x36, 0xd7, 0x50, 0xdf)
> > +
> >  #define EFI_LOADED_IMAGE_PROTOCOL_REVISION 0x1000
> >
> >  struct efi_loaded_image {
> > diff --git a/include/efi_loader.h b/include/efi_loader.h
> > index 512880ab8fbf..3f54e354bdcd 100644
> > --- a/include/efi_loader.h
> > +++ b/include/efi_loader.h
> > @@ -135,6 +135,7 @@ extern const efi_guid_t 
> > efi_guid_event_group_reset_system;
> >  /* GUID of the device tree table */
> >  extern const efi_guid_t efi_guid_fdt;
> >  extern const efi_guid_t efi_guid_loaded_image;
> > +extern const efi_guid_t efi_guid_loaded_image_device_path;
> >  extern const efi_guid_t efi_guid_device_path_to_text_protocol;
> >  extern const efi_guid_t efi_simple_file_system_protocol_guid;
> >  extern const efi_guid_t efi_file_info_guid;
> > diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_boottime.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_boottime.c
> > index 391681260c27..578b32a05ffd 100644
> > --- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_boottime.c
> > +++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_boottime.c
> > @@ -1519,6 +1519,7 @@ efi_status_t efi_setup_loaded_image(struct 
> > efi_device_path *device_path,
> >     efi_status_t ret;
> >     struct efi_loaded_image *info = NULL;
> >     struct efi_loaded_image_obj *obj = NULL;
> > +   struct efi_device_path *dp;
> >
> >     /* In case of EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCES avoid illegal free by caller. */
> >     *handle_ptr = NULL;
> > @@ -1542,15 +1543,19 @@ efi_status_t efi_setup_loaded_image(struct 
> > efi_device_path *device_path,
> >
> >     if (device_path) {
> >             info->device_handle = efi_dp_find_obj(device_path, NULL);
> > -           /*
> > -            * When asking for the device path interface, return
> > -            * bootefi_device_path
> > -            */
> > -           ret = efi_add_protocol(&obj->header,
> > -                                  &efi_guid_device_path, device_path);
> > -           if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS)
> > +
> > +           dp = efi_dp_append(device_path, file_path);
> 
> I think we should pass the original device_path as a parameter to
> efi_setup_loaded_image instead of first splitting and then recombining
> devicepath elements.

Agree, but I didn't modify the code because efi_setup_loaded_image()
is still used to load "efi_selftest" in bootefi.

I hope that you will work on do_efi_selftest().

> But let's leave this as a TODO after the rest of the refactoring.
> 
> > +           if (!dp) {
> > +                   ret = EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCES;
> >                     goto failure;
> > +           }
> > +   } else {
> > +           dp = NULL;
> >     }
> > +   ret = efi_add_protocol(&obj->header,
> > +                          &efi_guid_loaded_image_device_path, dp);
> 
> I wondered about the loaded imaged device path protocol possibly being
> NULL. But the spec explicitely states:
> 
> It is legal to call LoadImage() for a buffer in memory with a NULL
> DevicePath parameter. In this case, the Loaded Image Device Path
> Protocol is installed with a NULL interface pointer.

Right, I have also found this statement.

-Takahiro Akashi

> Reviewed-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.g...@gmx.de>
> 
> > +   if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS)
> > +           goto failure;
> >
> >     /*
> >      * When asking for the loaded_image interface, just
> > diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_image_loader.c 
> > b/lib/efi_loader/efi_image_loader.c
> > index fe66e7b9ffe1..c6177b9ff832 100644
> > --- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_image_loader.c
> > +++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_image_loader.c
> > @@ -14,6 +14,8 @@
> >  const efi_guid_t efi_global_variable_guid = EFI_GLOBAL_VARIABLE_GUID;
> >  const efi_guid_t efi_guid_device_path = DEVICE_PATH_GUID;
> >  const efi_guid_t efi_guid_loaded_image = LOADED_IMAGE_GUID;
> > +const efi_guid_t efi_guid_loaded_image_device_path
> > +           = LOADED_IMAGE_DEVICE_PATH_GUID;
> >  const efi_guid_t efi_simple_file_system_protocol_guid =
> >             EFI_SIMPLE_FILE_SYSTEM_PROTOCOL_GUID;
> >  const efi_guid_t efi_file_info_guid = EFI_FILE_INFO_GUID;
> >
> 
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to