On 3/18/19 1:31 PM, Ismael Luceno Cortes wrote:
> The name assigned to the USB host controller interface is a better
> indicator than the counter currently in use (which has no meaning other
> than being the order in which the interface is found).
>
> Example of the original output:
>> USB0: USB EHCI 1.10
>> scanning bus 0 for devices... 2 USB Device(s) found
>> scanning usb for storage devices... 1 Storage Device(s) found
>
> Patched output:
>> USB0(usb@ee080100): USB EHCI 1.10
>> scanning bus 0 for devices... 2 USB Device(s) found
>> scanning usb for storage devices... 1 Storage Device(s) found
>
> Signed-off-by: Ismael Luceno <ismael.luc...@silicon-gears.com>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> Changes since v1:
> - Improved commit message.
>
> drivers/usb/host/usb-uclass.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/usb-uclass.c b/drivers/usb/host/usb-uclass.c
> index 611ea97a72..0575f5393b 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/usb-uclass.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/usb-uclass.c
> @@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ int usb_init(void)
>
> uclass_foreach_dev(bus, uc) {
> /* init low_level USB */
> - printf("USB%d: ", count);
> + printf("USB%d(%s): ", count, bus->name);
> count++;
Hmmm, why dont we just drop the count altogether then ?
The output would then be:
USB %s: USB EHCI...
scanning bus %s for devices...
for %s being the bus->name.
With the improved commit message, this would actually make sense. Does
that make sense to you too or am I missing something ?
> #ifdef CONFIG_SANDBOX
>
> base-commit: 9ba5e5bc261a16f51662490da0cf620dc7f29013
>
--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
