On 3/1/19 11:37 AM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 11:30 AM Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote:
>>
>> On 2/26/19 10:27 PM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
>>> To find out how big the early malloc heap must be in SPL, add a debug
>>> print statement that dumps its usage before switching to relocated heap
>>> in spl_relocate_stack_gd() via CONFIG_SPL_STACK_R_MALLOC_SIMPLE_LEN.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Simon Goldschmidt <simon.k.r.goldschm...@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> common/spl/spl.c | 2 ++
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/common/spl/spl.c b/common/spl/spl.c
>>> index 2e2af1b28e..88d4b8a9bf 100644
>>> --- a/common/spl/spl.c
>>> +++ b/common/spl/spl.c
>>> @@ -728,6 +728,8 @@ ulong spl_relocate_stack_gd(void)
>>>
>>> #if defined(CONFIG_SPL_SYS_MALLOC_SIMPLE) && CONFIG_VAL(SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN)
>>> if (CONFIG_SPL_STACK_R_MALLOC_SIMPLE_LEN) {
>>> + debug("SPL malloc() before relocation used 0x%lx bytes (%ld
>>> KB)\n",
>>> + gd->malloc_ptr, gd->malloc_ptr / 1024);
>>
>> Shouldn't this use %p ?
>
> Despite its name, 'gd->malloc_ptr' is of type 'unsigned long', so I
> think this is
> correct. After all, I only copied the code from other places where the heap
> usage is dumped, too.
Isn't that broken on some arm64 systems then ? :)
--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
