On 23.02.19 02:10, André Przywara wrote: > On 22/02/2019 08:06, Alexander Graf wrote: >> >> >> On 21.02.19 02:30, Andre Przywara wrote: >>> Even though we introduced FIT image support for the SPL to cover the >>> 64-bit SoCs, there is no technical limitation to those parts. >>> >>> Change the Makefile stanza to always create a FIT image if the >>> particular config either provided a script or an .its file. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przyw...@arm.com> >>> --- >>> Makefile | 2 +- >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile >>> index d6e7c69f40..3a560e29bf 100644 >>> --- a/Makefile >>> +++ b/Makefile >>> @@ -1350,7 +1350,7 @@ u-boot-x86-16bit.bin: u-boot FORCE >>> endif >>> >>> ifneq ($(CONFIG_ARCH_SUNXI),) >>> -ifeq ($(CONFIG_ARM64),) >>> +ifeq ($(CONFIG_SPL_FIT_SOURCE)$(CONFIG_SPL_FIT_GENERATOR),) >> >> The commit message sounds as if this should be an "ifneq"? > > If find those ifeq(something,) constructs always confusing, but I think > it's right here: The line in the if-clause creates the *legacy* U-Boot > image, so the two strings must be both empty for it to match and to > execute those commands. If only one of them is "y", the comparison with > the empty string will fail and the else clause will be called, which > creates the FIT image. > > Or did I trick myself?
No, I just got confused myself, sorry :). All good. Reviewed-by: Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de> Alex _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
