Am Mo., 4. Feb. 2019, 16:16 hat Abel Vesa <abel.v...@nxp.com> geschrieben:
> On 19-02-04 08:19:23, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 09:03:43AM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 7:55 AM Abel Vesa <abel.v...@nxp.com> wrote: > > > > > > > If the SPL size (without the dtb appended) is larger then yes, the > build fails. > > > > Trouble is if the SPL (without the dtb appended) is, lets say, 63kB > and > > > > then the dtb is larger than 1kB. Then there is no mechanism in place > to check that > > > > and it will just fail to boot without giving any clues why. But this > is a totally > > > > unrelated problem from this patchset's point of view and I think it > impacts all > > > > the platforms that support SPL with DM. > > > > > > Yes, it is unrelated to this series and should be treated separately. > > > > I also agree. But, don't we have a mechanism for that? It sounds like > > some additional targets need to call $(BOARD_SIZE_CHECK) at the end. Or > > am I missing something? > > > > Hmm, I believe that is true. I haven't looked deeper into it but it seems > that's the thing the SPL is missing. Haven't we talked about that just some days or weeks ago? That's exactly what I am missing for socfpga. I keep getting broken SPL images when adding functionality. And you don't even get an error message because the dtb is broken and cannot provide the serial output mode... Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
