On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 10:34:21 +0100 Stefano Babic <sba...@denx.de> wrote:
> Hi Lukasz, > > On 10/01/19 10:29, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > Hi Stefano, > > > > [snip] > > >> There is a topic I would like to check. Stefan introduces with his > >> patches a DDRMC_CR80_MC_INIT_COMPLETE that is still missing in your > >> patches. I solved the conflict (not yet pushed to -next) as : > >> > >> while (!(readl(&ddrmr->cr[80]) & DDRMC_CR80_MC_INIT_COMPLETE)) > >> udelay(10); > >> writel(DDRMC_CR80_MC_INIT_COMPLETE, &ddrmr->cr[81]); > >> > >> #ifdef CONFIG_DDRMC_VF610_CALIBRATION > >> ddrmc_calibration(ddrmr); > >> #endif > >> > >> But I have no idea if DDRMC_CR80_MC_INIT_COMPLETE should be done > >> before the calibration of maybe after. Could you help me ? > > > > I've already rebased (DDR calibration code) on top of Stefan's > > patches: > > > > http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-dfu.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/testing > > > > The code in question looks like in below link: > > http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-dfu.git;a=blob;f=arch/arm/mach-imx/ddrmc-vf610.c;h=9a8e2f6aad10adc45fa791d24ffad52c42c5c492;hb=refs/heads/testing#l231 > > > > ok, thanks - so the DDRMC_CR80_MC_INIT_COMPLETE is called before > calibration. I have already did this by rebasing myself. There is no > need you repost, I have merged yours patches into my -next branch. > Thanks :-) (And I do have more vf610 patches in the queue to move it to DM - as it uses only single u-boot binary). I will post them when we release v2019.01 > Regards, > Stefano > Best regards, Lukasz Majewski -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-59 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: lu...@denx.de
pgpGbFtD1DS30.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
