Hi, On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 at 03:00, Jagan Teki <ja...@amarulasolutions.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 5:25 AM Boris Brezillon > <boris.brezil...@bootlin.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 04:40:30 +0530 > > Jagan Teki <ja...@amarulasolutions.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > I do really understand your intention about the real question. > > > - Any code or generic code will add in U-Boot should be driver-model > > > driven, are you agree this point? > > > Yes- thanks. > > > No - we need to have separate discussion. > > > > Depends on what you mean by driver-model driven. Yes, applying the DM > > sometimes makes sense, but blindly trying to push it everywhere just for > > the sake of being "DM compliant" is a huge mistake IMO. One example of > > the thing you suggested which didn't make sense at all: force MTD users > > to manipulate udevice objects instead of mtd_info ones. > > (+ Simon) > ie How we proceed when DM is introduced in U-Boot. May be you can ask > Simon or Other DM fellow developers if my statement doesn't make sense > to you. ie whole reason of spi-nor changes last for year.
I generally prefer to use DM fully. I am not sure what an mtd_info is if it isn't a device. > > > > > > > > > Any code that related to spi, or spi-flash should be driver-model > > > driven, ie what my AIM as a Maintainer (ie only reason for my spi-nor > > > changes resist for long time to fit). > > > > You seem to use the term "driver-model" a lot without clearly > > explaining what you have in mind. The driver-model should be used > > where it makes sense, but some of your suggestions don't make any sense > > to me. Like the proposal to add a SPI NOR uclass while we already have > > an MTD uclass which works just fine for all kind of flash devices. > > You better read the thread carefully. read what I'm saying on the thread[1] > > " So, if no driver should be part of spi-nor and all can be handle > spi-mem even-though they have controller specific features, yes we can > skip SPI_NOR_UCLASS otherwise we need spi-nor uclass that can be child > uclass of MTD" > > Did it state insisting SPI-NOR uclass, I was clearly giving if condition here. > > [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/1007589/ Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
