On 12/19/2018 10:48 AM, Ang, Chee Hong wrote: > On Wed, 2018-12-19 at 09:41 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: >> On 12/19/2018 05:55 AM, Ang, Chee Hong wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, 2018-12-18 at 18:47 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: >>>> >>>> On 12/18/2018 09:54 AM, chee.hong....@intel.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> From: "Ang, Chee Hong" <chee.hong....@intel.com> >>>>> >>>>> Enable Stratix10 FPGA reconfiguration support in defconfig. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Ang, Chee Hong <chee.hong....@intel.com> >>>>> --- >>>>> configs/socfpga_stratix10_defconfig | 1 + >>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/configs/socfpga_stratix10_defconfig >>>>> b/configs/socfpga_stratix10_defconfig >>>>> index 5f3d733..155c406 100644 >>>>> --- a/configs/socfpga_stratix10_defconfig >>>>> +++ b/configs/socfpga_stratix10_defconfig >>>>> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ CONFIG_NR_DRAM_BANKS=1 >>>>> CONFIG_BOOTDELAY=5 >>>>> CONFIG_SPL_SPI_LOAD=y >>>>> CONFIG_HUSH_PARSER=y >>>>> +CONFIG_FPGA_STRATIX10=y >>>>> CONFIG_SYS_PROMPT="SOCFPGA_STRATIX10 # " >>>>> CONFIG_CMD_MEMTEST=y >>>>> # CONFIG_CMD_FLASH is not set >>>>> >>>> Can you send a subsequent patch which uses Kconfig imply to >>>> select >>>> FPGA_STRATIX10 on S10 instead of adding it in defconfig ? >>> Noted. Will address this in next patchsets. >> I asked you for an incremental patch, not for reposting the whole >> patchset (also, please track changelog with new versions of patches). >> >> But travis would seem to indicate, again, that the patches break some >> other target [1]. Can you please at least build test the next version >> of >> patches on all systems before posting them ? >> >> You can very well just set up the travis CI with your github >> repo/fork >> of u-boot repo, push a branch there and wait for travis to build that >> branch on all supported systems and tell you what the situation is. >> It >> saves me time, which I otherwise spend on applying, rejecting and >> dropping of your patches after they fail to build. >> >> [1] https://travis-ci.org/marex/u-boot-socfpga/jobs/469629378#L1142 > > Ok. I only test the build for current (S10) target. Some of the code > are not tested with other build target. I will setup the travis CI and > test it on my side before submitting new patchsets. > But 1 of the build error is due to your code base missing the following > patch: > http://u-boot.10912.n7.nabble.com/PATCH-v2-Add-generic-FPGA-reconfig-ma > ilbox-API-for-S10-td343559.html#a343560 > All current patch has dependency on the patch mentioned above. > You will get build errors without this patch applied before current > patchsets.
Then please submit the complete series, the dependency is not mentioned anywhere. And yes, please do keep testing. -- Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot