On Sun, Dec 09, 2018 at 07:42:07AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote: > +Tom for the question about missing SoBs. > > Hi Jagan, > > On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 00:48:47 +0530 > Jagan Teki <ja...@amarulasolutions.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 3:25 PM Boris Brezillon > > <boris.brezil...@bootlin.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > This is the 4th version of the mtd / sf fixes patchset. This v4 just > > > adds a new check in del_mtd_device() (and a debug() when > > > del_mtd_partitions() fails). > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Boris > > > > > > P.S.: travis-ci results => > > > https://travis-ci.org/bbrezillon/u-boot/builds/461943011 > > > > > > Boris Brezillon (11): > > > mtd: Add a function to report when the MTD dev list has been updated > > > mtd: Parse mtdparts/mtdids again when the MTD list has been updated > > > mtd: Delete partitions attached to the device when a device is deleted > > > mtd: sf: Make sure we don't register the same device twice > > > mtd: Use get_mtdids() instead of env_get("mtdids") in > > > mtd_search_alternate_name() > > > mtd: Be more strict on the "mtdparts=" prefix check > > > mtd: Make sure the name passed in mtdparts fits in mtd_name[] > > > mtd: Make sure we don't parse MTD partitions belonging to another dev > > > mtd: Don't stop MTD partition creation when it fails on one device > > > mtd: sf: Unregister the MTD device prior to removing the spi_flash obj > > > mtd: sf: Make sf_mtd.c more robust > > > > Applied to u-boot-spi/master > > I see that those patches have been merged in mainline, which is great. > Just have one question: looks like your SoB is missing while you're > clearly reported as the committer. Since I found the same problem on > 2614a208471e ("common: command: tempory buffer should have size of > command line buf"), I wanted to know if this is a common practice in > u-boot to not add SoBs when maintainers apply patches to their tree?
So yes (and I should put this into that wiki sections where we do differ from Linux), if you as a custodian aren't making changes to a patch when applying it then no, you don't add your own SoB line. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
