Hi Stefan, I think those patches if I resubmit are same as before except the subjects differ. Anyway If no one complains then I will send.
Regards, David On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 02:46:17 -0400, Stefan Roese <s...@denx.de> wrote: > Hi David, > > On Thursday 08 April 2010 17:47:46 David Wu wrote: >> > I didn't mean that you should split this patch, but that you should >> > split it >> > from your *patchset* of 7 parts. Resulting in a patchset with 6 parts >> > ([PATCH >> > 1/6] ...) and one single patch. This way it's easier for me to pick up >> > such a >> > CFI related patch. >> >> OK. Will do it. >> A question: Do I have to do this way or just for convenience ? >> My concerns are >> 1 more traffic to the list > > Why would there be more traffic? Previously you did send 7 patches, > numbered > 1/7 ... 7/7. Now you would send 7 patches 1/6 ... 6/6 plus the CFI patch. >> 2 git will complain if applying the patch in the wrong order. > > The CFI patch is unrelated to the other patches. At least it wont > generate any > compilation breakages/problems, if this patch is applied before or after > your > other Coldfire patches. > Cheers, > Stefan > > -- > DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel > HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany > Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-0 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: off...@denx.de > > _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
