On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 09:09:50AM -0600, Adam Ford wrote: > On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 12:19 PM Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: > > > > Given that at this point the MMC subsystem itself has been migrated > > along with a number of subsystem drivers, formalize a deadline for > > migration. > > > > Cc: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > > Cc: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.ch...@samsung.com> > > Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> > > Out of curiosity, the series of patches are forcing various block > devices to comply with CONFIG_BLK by a certain deadline. What about > the more fundamental CONIFG_DM requirement? I know the CONFIG_BLK > implies CONFIG_DM is enabled, but if people don't have block devices > for some reason, there might be a few devices missed, so a warning > indicating CONFIG_DM isn't enabled might also be useful.
So, yes, we have not yet set a deadline on basic DM conversion. I haven't yet, and there's a few arches that haven't started and I'm talking with privately to see where things stand there. > My other concern about SPL devices where disabling DM in SPL saves > space, or in some cases is required to fit. Yes, what to do when switching to platform data isn't enough is an open question and I'm of a few minds still on if we should: - Allow some drivers to retain non-DM for SPL-only. - Declare that "TPL" is where the truly small and board/SoC/etc specific drivers need to reside. - Something else. As there's pros and cons to both of those approaches. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
