On 04.09.2018 12:30, Andreas Reichel wrote:
Hi all,

as Stefano Babic was so friendly and pointed out a few things already,
we come the following problematic points:

For SWupdate to access U-Boot's environment, it uses code from U-Boot.
Before 2015, fw_env.c was copied - hence out of version control,
afterwards and since then, a lib.a produced by U-Boot has been used
and renamed to libubootenv.a to link against.

However, this approach creates several difficulties:

* Distros like Debian cannot provide a devel package for SWUpdate like
   u-boot-dev, since U-Boot has its default environment code compiled
   board-dependently and Debian needed it board-independent.
   If a board-independent libubootenv.a was provided without
   a specific default environment, the first update process would destroy
   the U-Boot environment if it had had bad CRC before.
   (Thanks Stefano for this good point).

* If we have a board with U-Boot already preinstalled and want to
   compile SWUpdate for it, we need the sources of this very U-Boot to
   get the propper lib. For example in a debian-like build system we had to
   compile U-Boot again, although it is already installed since we lack
   a dev package.

* U-Boot does not provide any default means to install a development
   library. Thus anything we modify on-top might break with the next
   version.

First proposal by Stefano and me would be to somehow split the default
environment from the library to have a board-independent component and
board specific data that is passed to U-Boot and SWUpdate somehow.

Goal is to factor out U-Boot environment support for other software like
SWUpdate and not patching and hacking like its the case with recipes as in
openembedded atm.

Has there been any progress in the SWupdate/fw_setenv integration? I thought I remember reading something about letting fw_setenv extract the environment from the U-Boot binary in the target, but I cannot find the thread. I do think the current situation should be improved, making fw_setenv independent of the target that is built.

And as this thread is on the swupdate group as well: I would prefer calling an external fw_setenv tool instead of linking in the static library libubootenv.a...

Simon
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to