Hi, > On 20 Nov 2018, at 14:32, Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote: > > On 11/20/2018 02:27 PM, Sven Schwermer wrote: >>>> Here are the reasons why I don’t think so: >>>> 1) This particular order doesn’t break any builds. I triggered Travis CI >>>> runs for every patch in order and they have all succeeded. >>>> 2) Before this patch series, DM was enabled for both SPL and proper when >>>> setting CONFIG_DM_USB=y. >>> >>> Are you sure about this ? I recall boards which built SPL without DM and >>> U-Boot with DM USB. >> >> Well I’m not very experienced contributing to u-boot, this is a first, so >> I’m not certain. > > You sure picked an awesome topic for your first contribution :-) This is > certainly not an easy change.
So it seems. >> However, that was my train of thought. >> If you have a concrete defconfig I should check, I can do so. > > dh_imx6 for example. The generated .config is identical before and after the patch series for this board. It also compiles fine after the patch series. Sven _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
