On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 7:35 AM Jagan Teki <ja...@amarulasolutions.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 12:46 PM Simon Goldschmidt
> <simon.k.r.goldschm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > The table of spi flash chips 'spi_flash_ids' currently
> > includes chip names. The only usage of these is to
> > print the name when the chip is probed.
> >
> > Since this message is not shown in SPL, we can remove
> > the names from the SPL binary.
> >
> > Removing the chip names saves ~890 Byte from the SPL
> > binary in my configuration (socfpga_socrates_defconfig,
> > MACRONIX, SPANSION and STMICRO enabled).
>
> I'm not still quite happy with this change, other than reducing the
> size which introduces many ifdef's what would you benefits with this
> 890bytes? do you have any room to add any key features in SPL?

Well, SPL is always tight, isn't it? Currently, I have ~7.5 kB free on
my socfpga gen5 board. And to get the features required by management,
I will have to add suppport for loading U-Boot from a FIT image and
checking its signature.

Because of that, I figured saving RAM in SPL would be good. I don't
know my required features fit in after applying this patch, though.

But if you don't like it, feel free to drop it. I don't have an
immediate need to apply this.

Simon
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to