On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 12:21 PM Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote:
>
> On 10/10/2018 06:26 AM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> > This patch prevents disabling the FPGA bridges when
> > SPL or U-Boot is executed from FPGA onchip RAM.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Simon Goldschmidt <simon.k.r.goldschm...@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes in v4:
> > - use an inline function in misc.h to check for the address
> > range instead of a macro in base_addr_ac5.h
> >
> > Changes in v3:
> > - use __image_copy_start to check if we are executing from FPGA
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - use less ifdefs and more C code for address checks
> > (but this gives a checkpatch warning because of comparing two
> > upper case constants)
> > - changed comments
> >
> > arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_ac5.h | 1 +
> > arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/misc.h | 7 +++++++
> > arch/arm/mach-socfpga/misc_gen5.c | 10 +++++++++-
> > arch/arm/mach-socfpga/spl_gen5.c | 10 +++++++---
> > 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_ac5.h
> > b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_ac5.h
> > index bb9e3faa29..2725e9fcc3 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_ac5.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/base_addr_ac5.h
> > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> > #ifndef _SOCFPGA_BASE_ADDRS_H_
> > #define _SOCFPGA_BASE_ADDRS_H_
> >
> > +#define SOCFPGA_FPGA_SLAVES_ADDRESS 0xc0000000
> > #define SOCFPGA_STM_ADDRESS 0xfc000000
> > #define SOCFPGA_DAP_ADDRESS 0xff000000
> > #define SOCFPGA_EMAC0_ADDRESS 0xff700000
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/misc.h
> > b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/misc.h
> > index 4fc9570a04..e78a86503e 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/misc.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/misc.h
> > @@ -23,6 +23,13 @@ static inline void socfpga_fpga_add(void) {}
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5
> > void socfpga_sdram_remap_zero(void);
> > +static inline bool socfpga_is_fpga_slaves_addr(void *addr)
> > +{
>
> Is the inline needed ?
If it's in this header, yes. As without the inline, you get this compiler
warnings in files that include misc.h but don't call the function:
warning: ‘socfpga_is_fpga_slaves_addr’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> btw would it make sense to encode __image_copy_start here and just make
> it a function like ie.
>
> static bool socfpga_is_booting_from_fpga(void) {} ?
Sure. Do you want me to move it into misc_gen5.c r keep the inline?
Simon
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
