Hi all,
I totally forgot to answer that mail - but as I need this change my
motivation is back.
Am Do., 22. Juni 2017 um 08:50 Uhr schrieb Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com>:
>
> Hi Christian,
>
> On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 09:38:49AM +0200, Christian Gmeiner wrote:
> >> Hi Tom
> >>
> >> 2017-06-06 22:04 GMT+02:00 Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com>:
> >> > On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 01:51:38PM +0200, Christian Gmeiner wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmei...@gmail.com>
> >> >> ---
> >> >> include/configs/x86-common.h | 2 +-
> >> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> >>
> >> >> diff --git a/include/configs/x86-common.h b/include/configs/x86-common.h
> >> >> index b5ef8b5..9a97714 100644
> >> >> --- a/include/configs/x86-common.h
> >> >> +++ b/include/configs/x86-common.h
> >> >> @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@
> >> >> * Serial Configuration
> >> >> */
> >> >> #define CONFIG_SYS_BAUDRATE_TABLE {300, 600, 1200, 2400, 4800, \
> >> >> - 9600, 19200, 38400, 115200}
> >> >> + 9600, 19200, 38400, 57600,
> >> >> 115200}
> >> >> #define CONFIG_SYS_NS16550_PORT_MAPPED
> >> >>
> >> >> #define CONFIG_CMDLINE_EDITING
> >> >
> >> > Can we just use the fall back table instead? Thanks!
> >>
> >> Can you point me to the "fall back table"?
> >
> > If one isn't defined the one in <config_fallbacks.h> is used.
>
The fallback table looks okay and has 57600 as baud rate in it. The problematic
part is the xf86-common.h which defines CONFIG_SYS_BAUDRATE_TABLE and
as a result the fallback table plays no role here.
> Can you respin the patch per Tom's suggestion? Thanks!
I think that the current patch is okay as Tom's suggestion does not fly.
--
greets
--
Christian Gmeiner, MSc
https://christian-gmeiner.info
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
