On 08/27/2018 05:30 PM, Dalon L Westergreen wrote: > On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 05:52 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: >> On 08/20/2018 11:04 PM, Dalon L Westergreen wrote: >> On Mon, 2018-08-20 at 20:33 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: >> On 08/20/2018 03:54 PM, Dalon Westergreen wrote: >> Stratix10 requires a hex image of the spl for boot. The hex >> image is added to the FPGA configuration image and loaded to >> the processor memory by the configuration engine. >> >> Signed-off-by: Dalon Westergreen <dwest...@gmail.com >> <mailto:dwest...@gmail.com> <mailto:dwest...@gmail.com >> <mailto:dwest...@gmail.com>>> >> --- >> scripts/Makefile.spl | 10 ++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.spl b/scripts/Makefile.spl >> index 76d08fd92b..c424f87e6e 100644 >> --- a/scripts/Makefile.spl >> +++ b/scripts/Makefile.spl >> @@ -190,6 +190,7 @@ endif >> ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_SOCFPGA >> ALL-$(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5) += $(obj)/$(SPL_BIN).sfp >> ALL-$(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_ARRIA10) += $(obj)/$(SPL_BIN).sfp >> +ALL-$(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_STRATIX10) += $(obj)/$(SPL_BIN).hex >> endif >> >> ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_SUNXI >> @@ -299,6 +300,15 @@ OBJCOPYFLAGS_u-boot-x86-16bit-spl.bin := -O binary -j >> .start16 -j .resetvec >> $(obj)/u-boot-x86-16bit-spl.bin: $(obj)/u-boot-spl FORCE >> $(call if_changed,objcopy) >> >> +ifdef CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_STRATIX10 >> +OBJCOPYFLAGS_$(SPL_BIN).hex = -I binary -O ihex --change-addresses >> 0xffe00000 >> >> Why is this --change-address needed ? This smells like a hack of some >> sort ... >> >> I believe the tool that uses this file expects this offset, that said i have >> not >> >> tried using a hex file without this change address applied. I will try >> without >> >> this, and see what happens. >> >> You probably need to adjust the link address of the SPL or U-Boot too. >> > The link address appears to be correctly set to 0xffe00000 which is the > location of the onchip ram. > > The quartus_cpf tool itself errors out when the --change-address option is > not used. The quartus_cpf > > checks that the address range of the hex is entirely within the onchip ram. > My suggestion would > > be to leave the --change-address option as is.
So what is _not_ in the onchip RAM then ? Is something sticking out of the OCRAM , that's why the quartus_cpf fails ? Maybe that's something you should fix. -- Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
