On Wed, 2018-08-22 at 17:05 +0800, Bin Meng wrote: > Hi Andy, > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 9:52 PM, Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 2018-06-18 at 16:27 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Mon, 2018-06-18 at 21:03 +0800, Bin Meng wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 5:22 PM, Andy Shevchenko > > > > <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > I did not find the discussion. Do we need revert the changes in > > > > U- > > > > Boot? > > > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10098529/ > > > > > > It seems it has been dropped b/c v2 were sent and actually v3 was > > > anticipated, but never appear. > > > > Hmm... I'm wrong there is v3 and stated as applied. > > > > https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1559618.htm > > l > > > > Though in next-20180112 it was appeared last time. > > > > > > > > This one seems explains what is the issue with this field > > > > https://www.mail-archive.com/xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org/msg04706.htm > > l > > > > > > > > Also I didn't notice any blessing from hpa about protocol > > > extension. > > Sorry to bring this again. Looks as of today the addition to the > acpi_rsdp_addr member is still not merged mainstream kernel. Do you > think we need revert this in U-Boot, or keep it there but may cause > some confusion?
Hmm... I guess I answered to your previous message. Anyway, I agree for the revert until we will have a clear picture with upstream. -- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> Intel Finland Oy _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
