On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 09:28:30AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Maxime, > > On 24 July 2018 at 00:58, Maxime Ripard <maxime.rip...@bootlin.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 05:48:25PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On 20 July 2018 at 08:01, Lukasz Majewski <lu...@denx.de> wrote: > >> > Hi Eugen, > >> > > >> > Thanks for (re-)bringing the One wire support to u-boot. > >> > > >> >> Add a sandbox eeprom on the bus as a device, if sandbox driver is > >> >> configured. > >> >> > >> >> Signed-off-by: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hris...@microchip.com> > >> >> --- > >> >> drivers/w1/w1-uclass.c | 5 +++++ > >> >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > >> >> > >> >> diff --git a/drivers/w1/w1-uclass.c b/drivers/w1/w1-uclass.c > >> >> index cfddda3..e58c1ca 100644 > >> >> --- a/drivers/w1/w1-uclass.c > >> >> +++ b/drivers/w1/w1-uclass.c > >> >> @@ -142,6 +142,11 @@ static int w1_enumerate(struct udevice *bus) > >> >> } > >> >> } > >> >> > >> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_W1_EEPROM_SANDBOX > >> >> + /* before we are finished, add a sandbox device if we can */ > >> >> + w1_new_device(bus, W1_FAMILY_EEP_SANDBOX); > >> >> +#endif > >> > > >> > IMHO we shouldn't mix the sandbox code with production (on boards) code. > >> > > >> > Maybe Simon (+CCed) could provide some more input here? > >> > >> I have not seen this series. But new devices should be created > >> automatically based on them being in the device tree. So you should > >> just be able to add them there. > > > > 1-Wire is discoverable, so there's no device nodes in the DT. > > Well there should be. See for example PCI, USB, I2C and SPI :-)
I didn't know u-boot's sandbox had binding for USB and PCI devices. My bad :) Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot