Dear Sam, In message <CAKaJLVuxoS0mz9pDDYqmqomsSfd83kSed=LZ261=wfuuc-q...@mail.gmail.com> you wrote: > > Also, I figured how to do prefixing (to display MMC errors as nested > w.r.t. "Loading environment), without adding new field to gd. We can > just add some new GD_LG_ and print prefix when it's installed. I'm > gonna send new RFC soon. Please let me know what you think about [1].
This is IMO a totally wrong approach. We don't want to add more code (and more output) jsut to paper over inconsistent error reporting. This problem should be fixed at the root cause, i. e. we should report errors where they are detected, and only once. If all callers can rely that, in the error path, their callees which return error codes, have already printed appropriate messages, there is no need to print even more lines. What we need is not fancy code, but consistent (and consequent) error handling. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de "One day," said a dull voice from down below, "I'm going to be back in form again and you're going to be very sorry you said that. For a very long time. I might even go so far as to make even more Time just for you to be sorry in." - Terry Pratchett, _Small Gods_ _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot