Hi Sandeep,

You wrote:
> I checked this feature some days back after I rebased with Wolfgang.
[snip]
> Net:   Ethernet PHY: GENERIC @ 0x01

Well it's good to know that it must be something wrong with my
tools or my board :-)

>> My expectation was that this stuff would work fine out of the box and
>> clearly isn't for me -- I hope this is just something I'm doing wrong
>> here and that someone is able to confirm that the code's kosher and
>> maybe pointers as to what I could have done wrong?
> This is your custom board correct. I am using the Spectrum Digital DM365 EVM

No; I don't have a custom board (yet) - I'm also using the DM365EVM...
which was why I was hoping things would "just work" out of the box.

I guess I'll have to try and debug around the network code directly...
to find out why the "Ethernet PHY:" part isn't being displayed.

Thanks for the dump - it's always really useful to compare output
against a working system!


>> I do notice that the "Net: " line above has no further detail, wheras
>> the TI PSP binary version says "Ethernet PHY: GENERIC @ 0x00"
>> (I've not managed to get a 2009.03 build of my own to run on DM365
>> to compare yet... that's the version TI supplied as binary somehow)
> The other issue might be the updates tot eh EMAC driver. The version that 
> finally was accepted by Ben was submitted by Nick Thompson. It worked fine 
> for me but I'm not sure if something small was missed.
>
> Maybe you can compare the driver that TI release as part of PSP 3.01 and what 
> is there in u-boot at the moment.
> I'll do so myself as soon as I get some free cycles.

That's what I want to do but I guess I must be myopic... I can't
see or find the U-Boot sources in the PSP.   I'll look again.


(Re SPI flash)
> I have not tried SPI FLASH from U-boot myself. I have tried SPI with flash in 
> the kernel.
>
> Did you do all the necessary PINMUX?

Aha! No. I didn't realise I would need to do that myself.  My fault
there then.  I'll investigate this.  Thanks for the pointer!

 > The TI engineer who did the SPI driver for U-boot must have only
 > tested on OMAP L chips. The SPI IP is similar but not same.

A little worrysome ;)   Maybe Davinci SPI support in U-Boot isn't
very well fledged and tested just now - something for me to work on.


Regards,

Ian.



_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to