On 10.06.18 15:25, Bin Meng wrote: > Attempting to use a toolchain that is preconfigured to generate code > for the 32-bit architecture (i386), for example, the i386-linux-gcc > toolchain on kernel.org, to compile the 64-bit EFI payload does not > build. This updates the makefile fragments to ensure '-m64' is passed > to toolchain when building the 64-bit EFI payload stub codes. > > Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com>
Is there any sane reason to keep the split between EFI and U-Boot long size alive? The x86_64 U-Boot port is getting along reasonably well from what I can tell and 32bit UEFI implementations on 64-bit hosts are dying out. So can't we just remove all of that cruft altogether instead and just have x86_64 U-Boot with 64bit EFI stub and i386 U-Boot with 32bit EFI stub as only combinations? That would dramatically simplify the code. Alex _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
