On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 08:20:30PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 05/19/2018 04:36 PM, Simon Glass wrote: > > On 18 May 2018 at 03:22, Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote: > >> > >> The recent ext4 cache discussion would indicate that the block cache > >> is a desired feature, yet hidden and not enabled most of the time. > >> Enable the block cache by default since it provides significant block > >> device access performance improvement and if there are some users who > >> cannot enable it ie. due to size limitations, those should disable it > >> explicitly in their board config. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> > >> Cc: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > >> Cc: Michal Simek <michal.si...@xilinx.com> > >> Cc: Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> > >> --- > >> drivers/block/Kconfig | 2 +- > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > > I was hoping to get some feedback ?
So, as I was asking on IRC, can you show the code paths where this gets used outside of CONFIG_BLK and then really ext4/fat/btrfs as I do in my patch? -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
