On Friday 16 March 2018 02:36 PM, Alex Kiernan wrote: > I was looking at the differences between the TI U-Boot tree and the > upstream tree (as we've switched from one to the other) and I think > the only patch which I'm picking locally which isn't in upstream is > this one: > > [U-Boot,RFC,3/3] spl: Add support for enabling dcache > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/699899/ > > As far as I can tell the other two patches in the series were applied, > just not this one and I can't see what the changes that were requested > were.
Since this is affecting all the available SoCs, we have to make sure that it does not break any existing platforms. Tom reported that it broke few platforms. > > When we first had that change it did cause us some problems, but only > because we needed some settle time once the DDR clocks were > configured. > > How do we get it back reconsidered for merging? > May be I should create a separate kconfig entry and guard all the code with it? So it can be enabled as necessary. I did some changes after that but could not post it upstream. Will check if I can post it upstream soon. But, thanks a lot for reminding me :) Regards, Lokesh _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
