Hi,
On Wednesday 14 February 2018 08:04 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 07:59:46PM +0530, Faiz Abbas wrote:
>
>> Since 82b9dc63 ("Only build cli_readline.o for CMDLINE on non-SPL"),
>> cli_simple.c is only being built for non-SPL case. However, dfu_mmc
>> requires cli_simple.c to build and dfu fails to build for SPL when
>> CONFIG_HUSH_PARSER is disabled.
>>
>> Therefore, limit dfu_mmc to non-SPL case only.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Faiz Abbas <faiz_ab...@ti.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/dfu/Makefile | 2 ++
>> drivers/dfu/dfu.c | 2 ++
>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> Does DFU for MMC make sense inside of SPL?
No.
If so, you should follow
> 82b9dc63 and CONFIG_FSL_DDR_INTERACTIVE and bring back in cli_simple.o
> (and cli_readline.o, if needed) for CONFIG_SPL_DFU_MMC or so. If not,
> we should more cleanly and clearly block out all non-DFU RAM cases for
> SPL. Thanks!
Do you mean non-RAM DFU cases? Block out everything but RAM?
Thanks,
Faiz
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
