Hi Alex, > On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 9:44 PM, Lukasz Majewski <lu...@denx.de> > wrote: > > On Sun, 11 Feb 2018 21:04:46 +0000 > > Alex Kiernan <alex.kier...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> > >> That said, squashing in that change doesn't obviously break > >> anything for me, and is probably a step in the right direction. > >> > >> I'll see what Travis thinks. > >> > > > > We will probably receive build breaks... > > Yup... https://travis-ci.org/akiernan/u-boot/jobs/340344489 > > Just tried again on one of those failures (x600) with the the default > removed and just set the on board that uses CONFIG_EXT, but that then > fails at config time.
Ok. I see > > TBH I'd actually like to take it out of Kconfig (which I realise is > the wrong direction) as it just feels fundamentally wrong the way it > is. To finish moving SYS_BOOTCOUNT_ADDR to Kconfig we would need to add its definition to each eligible ./configs/<board>_defconfig file. Then we would have the previous behaviour preserved. > I don't know what the U-Boot approach configuration like this > is... struggling to find prior art. Let's ask Tom for his opinion as he did much such work before. > Best regards, Lukasz Majewski -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de
pgpHcpb3m0FQx.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
