> On 25 Jan 2018, at 11:09, Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonog...@linaro.org> wrote: > > On 18/01/18 11:21, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: >> On 18/01/18 01:31, Kever Yang wrote: >>> I don't think we can reuse IH_TYPE_TEE， it use a optee.img type create by >>> mkimage and it seem use more then one cpu. >> Don't really understand what you mean by using more than one CPU - can you >> give an example in the code ? >> --- >> bod > > So - what's the proposed resolution here ?
Where do we stand on this: can we reuse IH_TYPE_TEE, will be use IH_TYPE_OPTEE or will there be a new IH_TYPE_OPTEE_SPL? This series has been hanging in limbo for the better part of January and it seems as if just a naming issue is holding it back at the moment… Thanks, Philipp. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
