> > > >> --- > > > > The 16-bit detection conflicts with > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-November/064139.html > > > > Which way should I resolve the conflict? Or does one of you want to > respin? > > I don't see 16BIT/2KPAGE/get_nfc_info defined for MX31... and does MX25 > > share MX27's imx-regs.h? >
> > I think it would be nice to keep all MXC-NAND-stuff in the driver, that > includes the IS_16BIT and other routines. > It is fine with me to keep things that use only registers in the mxc in the driver. Other stuff should be factored out into imx-regs.h mx25 and mx27 do not share an imx-regs.h but bot have one. My thinking was that a future patch could have mx31 rename its imx31-regs.h to imx-regs.h so they could all be consistent. > > > Magnus, can you test this patch on MX31? > > Yes, but I'm not sure when. Wednesday or Thursday perhaps. > > /Magnus > >
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
