Vipin KUMAR wrote:
> On 1/18/2010 12:49 PM, Ben Warren wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> if (chip->cpufreq == -1)
>>>>> @@ -156,6 +215,13 @@ int do_chip_config(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag,
>>>>> int argc, char *argv[])
>>>>> else
>>>>> printf("DDR Type = Not Known\n");
>>>>>
>>>>> + if (!i2c_read_mac(mac)) {
>>>>> + sprintf(i2c_mac, "%pM", mac);
>>>>> + printf("Ethaddr (from i2c mem) = %s\n", i2c_mac);
>>>>>
>>>> Maybe I'm missing some context, but why's the sprintf needed?
>>>>
>>> Yes, sprintf is not needed here
>>> Thanks for pointing out
>>>
>
> Hello Tom,
> Should I send the whole patch set again or only the subpatch after
> removing the sprintf
Let us wait for feed back from nand and usb subsystem so we
can a accumulate them in just one patch set.
Tom
>
> Regards
> Vipin
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
