On 19 January 2018 at 16:41, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: > OK. For v2, if you can convert CONFIG_SYS_NS16550_MEM32 to Kconfig as > well I'd appreciate it.
I'm not hugely comfortable doing that, since that would affect even more targets. To be honest, I don't understand why it even exists as a separate var instead of just testing whether CONFIG_SYS_NS16550_REG_SIZE is 4 or -4. Are there actually some crazy targets that allocate 4 bytes per register yet fail if you use 32-bit access? Would you object hugely to me just implicitly setting CONFIG_SYS_NS16550_MEM32 in ns16550.h for the c6x uart variant? I think it makes a lot of sense to do so, since in that case the driver itself explicitly depends on being able to write a value that doesn't fit in a byte. > I'll see about digging out and setting up one > of my da8xx platforms for a quick runtime test too. Thanks! Matthijs _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
