On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 04:16:41PM -0800, Sergey Kubushyn wrote: > On Fri, 8 Dec 2017, Simon Glass wrote: > > >Hi Stephen, > > > >On 8 December 2017 at 16:28, Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org> wrote: > >>Simon, > >> > >>Is it expected that the latest u-boot-dm.git master branch now requires > >>swig? All the non-sandbox builds on my test systems are failing: > >> > >> CHK include/config/uboot.release > >> CHK include/generated/timestamp_autogenerated.h > >> GEN ./Makefile > >> UPD include/generated/timestamp_autogenerated.h > >> CHK include/config.h > >> CFG u-boot.cfg > >> SHIPPED scripts/dtc/pylibfdt/libfdt.i > >> PYMOD scripts/dtc/pylibfdt/_libfdt.so > >>unable to execute 'swig': No such file or directory > >>error: command 'swig' failed with exit status 1 > >>make[4]: *** [scripts/dtc/pylibfdt/_libfdt.so] Error 1 > >>make[3]: *** [scripts/dtc/pylibfdt] Error 2 > >>make[2]: *** [scripts/dtc] Error 2 > >>make[1]: *** [scripts] Error 2 > >>make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > > > >Yes, unless we have a very recent libfdt on the system (and even then > >I'm not sure that it is picked up). We need swig to build pylibfdt > >which is needed for binman. > > Err, would it be long before we need Java/Eclipse/Maven/younameit to just > build U-Boot?
There is a fine line to be walked here. On the flip side, do we want to have to depend on N little external tools to put together a functional image? We can use binman to avoid some subset of that. That said, Simon, are we only building binman related stuff when we need binman in the end? Thanks! -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
