Hi Bin,

On 29.11.2017 09:30, Bin Meng wrote:

<snip>

I wrote some codes soemthing like:

s64 a, b, c;
c = a/b;

The compiler will generate codes to call __divdi3. This works before your
patch.


Yes, I understand this. But right now, we don't have any code
generating this error. And if this will happen at some time, I would
prefer to investigate this code sequence introducing this division, to
use the division functions / macros available in U-Boot (as mentioned
above) and in the kernel instead.

Here a short explanation, why this new version is preferred to the
currently available functions pulled from libgcc: We are fixing an
"ugly" Yocto build problem with this patch, related to 32bit binaries
with 64bit toolchains (multilib) building by not relying on anything
from libgcc. Please see this thread for some more details:

https://www.mail-archive.com/yocto@yoctoproject.org/msg36721.html

I hope this helps a bit to understand the motivation behind this patch.


Thanks for the background. I am not familiar with yocto project, but
is the build broken due to the gcc on the build host does not ship
with multilib?

Please take a look at the email thread mentioned above for a detailed
explanation. Especially this post should answer your questions:

https://www.mail-archive.com/yocto@yoctoproject.org/msg36748.html

I am using a 64-bit host with gcc multilib, and there is no such build
error observed.

Right. This issue is only seen on Yocto builds (AFAIK). But again,
I would really like to see U-Boot x86 being self-contained without
any host libgcc dependencies as on other architectures as well.

Thanks,
Stefan
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to