2017-11-29 10:42 GMT+09:00 Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com>: > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 12:17:35AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: >> 2017-11-28 23:52 GMT+09:00 Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com>: >> > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 09:23:18PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: >> > >> >> Buildman test passed. >> >> >> >> >> >> Masahiro Yamada (5): >> >> Move CONFIG_PANIC_HANG to Kconfig >> >> ARM: openrd: set CONFIG_LOGLEVEL to 2 >> >> Enable CONFIG_PANIC_HANG for boards without do_reset() >> >> treewide: convert assert() to BUG_ON() >> >> Remove assert() >> > >> > Have you done a size check on this series? If not, I'll fire one up, >> > thanks! >> > >> >> I think I did it correctly. >> >> At least, I needed the following patch for openrd boards: >> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/842106/ >> >> Looks like the NAND core pull-request needs it, too. > > So, in my testing (which is gcc-6 for everything thanks to Debian/9): > 06: Remove assert() > arm: + clearfog peach-pi snow smdk5250 smdk5420 turris_omnia spring > omap3_evm peach-pit > -(am335x_hs_evm) arm-linux-gnueabihf-ld.bfd: region `.sram' overflowed by 760 > bytes > +(clearfog,turris_omnia) arm-linux-gnueabihf-ld.bfd: SPL image too big > +(am335x_hs_evm) arm-linux-gnueabihf-ld.bfd: region `.sram' overflowed by > 1080 bytes > +(snow,smdk5250,peach-pi,smdk5420,spring,peach-pit) > arch/arm/mach-exynos/built-in.o: In function `clock_calc_best_scalar': > +(snow,smdk5250,peach-pi,smdk5420,spring,peach-pit) > build/../arch/arm/mach-exynos/clock.c:1408: undefined reference to `panic' > +(omap3_evm) arm-linux-gnueabihf-ld.bfd: region `.sram' overflowed by 28 bytes > > And then a lot of platforms grow in size. Taking a harder peek, BUG_ON > is always set. However, assert() is only set when DEBUG is set. Now, I > can certainly see an argument along the lines of that being fairly > unexpected, and I don't know that I would disagree. > > After a very quick look over what git grep -l says, perhaps we want to > introduce a new (default off) option to preserve the current behavior of > assert() in BUG_ON, as it looks like almost only kernel imported code is > using BUG_ON. >
Do you have an idea for the option name? -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
