On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 1:17 AM, Dr. Philipp Tomsich <philipp.toms...@theobroma-systems.com> wrote: > Jagan, Maxime & Tom, > > I have a couple of changes to spl_fit.c queued that we need to get merged to > fix some issues for ATF support on Rockchip platforms.
Does all rk64 has enough SPL size's to fit? > However, due to internal alignment before the ARMv8 vectors, this breaks the > sun50i builds (all exceeding their SPL size by up to approx. 1KB), even > though I am adding only about a 100 bytes to the size of spl_fit.c. Yes, as per as my trails[1] it's not possible to increase SPL size. > > The change that triggers this is: > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/813598/ > > However, the root cause lies in the “.align 11” in exceptions.c, which > generates a ‘*fill*’ similar to this one (and we have been lucky enough that > this came out as a rather small number up until me increasing the size of > spl_fit.o): > *fill* 0x0000000000011214 0x5ec > .text.vectors 0x0000000000011800 0x838 > arch/arm/cpu/armv8/built-in.o > > The quickest way to resolve would be to drop support for exception vectors on > sun50i. Don't we miss the exceptions during SPL? > Any other suggestions are also welcome. I would rather think to implement TPL provided if there is no option to increase the SPL size instead of missing exception vectors. [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/835973/ thanks! -- Jagan Teki Senior Linux Kernel Engineer | Amarula Solutions U-Boot, Linux | Upstream Maintainer Hyderabad, India. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
