On Sun, Oct 08, 2017 at 09:56:15AM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote: > On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 10:06 PM, Jonathan Gray <j...@jsg.id.au> wrote: > > > I wonder if you have the same kind of fat filesystem. > > No, I have only used ext4 file system. > > > Can you try writing > > https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/armv7/miniroot-cubox-62.fs > > to an sd card then write a new SPL/U-Boot at the standard raw offsets? > > Maybe it will be easier if you try a 'git bisect' to find out where > the regression is coming from.
It turns out to be commit 2460098cffacd18729262e3ed36656e6943783ed Author: Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> Date: Fri Sep 22 07:37:43 2017 -0400 fs/fat: Reduce stack usage We have limited stack in SPL builds. Drop itrblock and move to malloc/free of itr to move this off of the stack. As part of this fix a double-free issue in fat_size(). Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> --- Rework to use malloc/free as moving this to a global overflows some SH targets. fs/fat/fat.c | 14 ++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) With that reverted I just get the efi loader problem, no alignment errors. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot