Hi Heinrich,
On 15 September 2017 at 00:48, Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.g...@gmx.de> wrote:
> On 08/31/2017 02:52 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> On 27 August 2017 at 06:53, Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.g...@gmx.de> wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.g...@gmx.de>
>>> ---
>>> include/efi_api.h | 22 ++++++++
>>> include/efi_loader.h | 1 +
>>> lib/efi_loader/efi_boottime.c | 119
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>> 3 files changed, 141 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
>>
>> Please see below.
>>
>>> diff --git a/include/efi_api.h b/include/efi_api.h
>>> index 8efc8dfab8..b2838125d7 100644
>>> --- a/include/efi_api.h
>>> +++ b/include/efi_api.h
>>> @@ -609,4 +609,26 @@ struct efi_pxe {
>>> struct efi_pxe_mode *mode;
>>> };
>>>
>>> +#define EFI_DRIVER_BINDING_PROTOCOL_GUID \
>>> + EFI_GUID(0x18a031ab, 0xb443, 0x4d1a,\
>>> + 0xa5, 0xc0, 0x0c, 0x09, 0x26, 0x1e, 0x9f, 0x71)
>>> +struct efi_driver_binding_protocol {
>>> + efi_status_t (EFIAPI * supported)(
>>
>> I think the * should be up against 'supported'. Similarly below.
>
> This is what checkpatch wants to see. Your suggestion leads to
>
> ERROR: need consistent spacing around '*' (ctx:WxV)
> #25: FILE: include/efi_api.h:616:
> + efi_status_t (EFIAPI *supported)(
>
> So I prefer not change this before checkpatch.pl is not giving a
> different result.
OK I see. I suppose the EFIAPI is confusing it.
>
>>
>>> + struct efi_driver_binding_protocol *this,
>>> + efi_handle_t controller_handle,
>>> + struct efi_device_path *remaining_device_path);
>>> + efi_status_t (EFIAPI * start)(
>>> + struct efi_driver_binding_protocol *this,
>>> + efi_handle_t controller_handle,
>>> + struct efi_device_path *remaining_device_path);
>>> + efi_status_t (EFIAPI * stop)(
>>> + struct efi_driver_binding_protocol *this,
>>> + efi_handle_t controller_handle,
>>> + UINTN number_of_children,
>>> + efi_handle_t child_handle_buffer);
>>
>> These should have function comments.
>>
>>> + u32 version;
>>> + efi_handle_t image_handle;
>>> + efi_handle_t driver_binding_handle;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> #endif
>>> diff --git a/include/efi_loader.h b/include/efi_loader.h
>>> index 9c68246c7c..f9f33e1d01 100644
>>> --- a/include/efi_loader.h
>>> +++ b/include/efi_loader.h
>>> @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ extern const struct efi_device_path_to_text_protocol
>>> efi_device_path_to_text;
>>>
>>> extern const efi_guid_t efi_guid_console_control;
>>> extern const efi_guid_t efi_guid_device_path;
>>> +extern const efi_guid_t efi_guid_driver_binding_protocol;
>>
>> comment for this?
>
> The GUIDs are defined in the UEFI spec.
> So maybe we should just put a comment above all of these.
I know what a GUID is (or can look up efi_guid_t to find out) but not
what these variables are for.
Regards,
Simon
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
