Kever, Thanks for the fix.
Could we move all RK3399 boards to use OF_CONTROL (i.e. not OF_PLATDATA) in SPL? We have been using this for the RK3399-Q7 and there is plenty of SRAM left for future code-growth, so this should be a safe choice. Regards, Philipp. > On 7 Sep 2017, at 05:20, Kever Yang <kever.y...@rock-chips.com> wrote: > > After Simon's patch, the dtoc can work with 64bit address, > so we need to fix reg number for it. > Depend on Simon's patch set: > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/807266/ > > Signed-off-by: Kever Yang <kever.y...@rock-chips.com> Reviewed-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.toms...@theobroma-systems.com> > --- > > drivers/ram/rockchip/sdram_rk3399.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/ram/rockchip/sdram_rk3399.c > b/drivers/ram/rockchip/sdram_rk3399.c > index 63342ab..5ed4b03 100644 > --- a/drivers/ram/rockchip/sdram_rk3399.c > +++ b/drivers/ram/rockchip/sdram_rk3399.c > @@ -1115,7 +1115,7 @@ static int conv_of_platdata(struct udevice *dev) > int ret; > > ret = regmap_init_mem_platdata(dev, dtplat->reg, > - ARRAY_SIZE(dtplat->reg) / 4, > + ARRAY_SIZE(dtplat->reg) / 2, > &plat->map); > if (ret) > return ret; > -- > 1.9.1 > _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
