Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Peter Tyser,
> 
> In message <1258943983.9357.20.ca...@ptyser-laptop> you wrote:
>> My personal preference would be to take it a step further and organize
>> like:
>>
>> /arch/$ARCH/
>>      /lib/<sources currently in lib_$ARCH/>
>>      /include/asm/<headers currently in incluce/asm-$ARCH/>
>>      /cpu/<appropriate cpu directories in cpu/>
>>      /config.mk (old lib_$ARCH/config.mk)
>>
>> /lib/
>>         /<source files currently in lib_generic>
>>         /libfdt/
>>         /lzma/
>>         /lzo/
>>
>> This layout would more closely match the Linux layout and is cleaner
>> overall in my opinion.  What do others think of this idea?
> 
> I generally agree with the idea, with the exception of
> /include/asm/<headers> - I really hate this change in the Linux
> kernel, and still fail to see any advantages of this.

I really like only having one subtree to grep for arch stuff, and it 
would avoid presenting files that are in git, under a path that git 
doesn't know about.

Plus, the symlink is one less thing that the makefiles would need to 
keep in sync when arch changes.

-Scott
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to