Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Peter Tyser, > > In message <1258943983.9357.20.ca...@ptyser-laptop> you wrote: >> My personal preference would be to take it a step further and organize >> like: >> >> /arch/$ARCH/ >> /lib/<sources currently in lib_$ARCH/> >> /include/asm/<headers currently in incluce/asm-$ARCH/> >> /cpu/<appropriate cpu directories in cpu/> >> /config.mk (old lib_$ARCH/config.mk) >> >> /lib/ >> /<source files currently in lib_generic> >> /libfdt/ >> /lzma/ >> /lzo/ >> >> This layout would more closely match the Linux layout and is cleaner >> overall in my opinion. What do others think of this idea? > > I generally agree with the idea, with the exception of > /include/asm/<headers> - I really hate this change in the Linux > kernel, and still fail to see any advantages of this.
I really like only having one subtree to grep for arch stuff, and it would avoid presenting files that are in git, under a path that git doesn't know about. Plus, the symlink is one less thing that the makefiles would need to keep in sync when arch changes. -Scott _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot