On 08/28/2017 02:33 AM, Ran Wang wrote:
> Low Frequency Periodic Signaling(LFPS) Peak-to-Peak Differential
> Output Voltage Test Compliance fails using default transmitter
> settings
>
> Change config of transmitter signal swings by setting register
> PCSTXSWINGFULL to 0x47 to pass compliance tests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sriram Dash <sriram.d...@nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rajesh Bhagat <rajesh.bha...@nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Suresh Gupta <suresh.gu...@nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ran Wang <ran.wan...@nxp.com>
> ---
> Change in v4:
> Update commit message about register setting.
> Clean up the math in set_usb_pcstxswingfull().
> Rename USB_PCSTXSWINGFULL to SCFG_USB_PCSTXSWINGFULL.
>
> Change in v3:
> Use inline function to make code cleaner.
> Correct typo of 'CONFIG_ARCH_LS1043A'.
>
> Change in v2:
> In function erratum_a008997():
> 1.Put a blank line after variable declaration.
<snip>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_LS1043A) || defined(CONFIG_ARCH_LS1046A)
> +static inline void set_usb_pcstxswingfull(u32 __iomem *scfg, u32 offset)
> +{
> + u32 val;
> +
> + val = scfg_in32(scfg + offset / 4);
> + val &= ~(0x7F << 9);
> + val |= (SCFG_USB_PCSTXSWINGFULL << 9);
> + scfg_out32(scfg + offset / 4, val);
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +static void erratum_a008997(void)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A008997
> +#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_LS1043A) || defined(CONFIG_ARCH_LS1046A)
I didn't notice this before. Why checking LS1043A or LS1046A? I don't
see "else" below.
York
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
