On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 12:45 AM, Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote: > On 08/25/2017 06:28 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 9:43 PM, Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote: >>> On 08/25/2017 06:07 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: >>>> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 6:47 AM, Yang, Wenyou <wenyou.y...@microchip.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> This patch set has been here for a long time, could you have a look and >>>>> take >>>>> it? >>>> >>>> Yeah, I'm holding this because of my current spi-nor work. But anyway >>>> I will try to merge on coming MW If all OK. >>> >>> Is your work posted somewhere or available in some git repository ? > > You did not answer this question. > >>> I don't see any reason why you should not perform your maintainer duties >>> by reviewing/replying to an incoming patch, no matter what work you do >>> to the subsystem though ... >> >> I didn't write "this series holding spi-nor work" since it has some >> new features I'm taking time to review. > > I never implied this. Rather the opposite, you claim you do some work on > the SPI NOR core, yet you let this patchset rot in the list for over a > month now and gave the author zero feedback. > > Notifying the author about the core changes early could've prevented a > lot of wasted effort on his side. Reviewing early could've prevented a > lot of frustration from patches being ignored. > >> There is nothing wrong with >> maintainer duties here, you must need to understand. > > I disagree. >
I agree with Marek here. I found it's really hard to get feedback for SF patches in time and what I have to do is to ping again and again. Regards, Bin _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
