On 08/07/2017 11:31 PM, Z.q. Hou wrote: > Hi York, > > Thanks a lot for your comments! > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: York Sun >> Sent: 2017年8月8日 5:18 >> To: Z.q. Hou <zhiqiang....@nxp.com>; u-boot@lists.denx.de >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] fsl-lsch2: csu: correct the workaround A-010315 >> >> On 07/03/2017 03:07 AM, Zhiqiang Hou wrote: >>> From: Hou Zhiqiang <zhiqiang....@nxp.com> >>> >>> The implementation of workaround A-010315 is wrong, it updated other >>> IP's CSU registers. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <zhiqiang....@nxp.com> >>> --- >>> board/freescale/common/ns_access.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- >>> include/fsl_csu.h | 2 +- >>> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/board/freescale/common/ns_access.c >>> b/board/freescale/common/ns_access.c >>> index 1c2287d..0c3a54c 100644 >>> --- a/board/freescale/common/ns_access.c >>> +++ b/board/freescale/common/ns_access.c >>> @@ -10,15 +10,15 @@ >>> #include <asm/arch/ns_access.h> >>> #include <asm/arch/fsl_serdes.h> >>> >>> -void set_devices_ns_access(struct csu_ns_dev *ns_dev, u16 val) >>> +void set_devices_ns_access(unsigned long index, u16 val) >>> { >>> u32 *base = (u32 *)CONFIG_SYS_FSL_CSU_ADDR; >>> u32 *reg; >>> uint32_t tmp; >>> >>> - reg = base + ns_dev->ind / 2; >>> + reg = base + index / 2; >>> tmp = in_be32(reg); >>> - if (ns_dev->ind % 2 == 0) { >>> + if (index % 2 == 0) { >>> tmp &= 0x0000ffff; >>> tmp |= val << 16; >>> } else { >>> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ static void enable_devices_ns_access(struct >> csu_ns_dev *ns_dev, uint32_t num) >>> int i; >>> >>> for (i = 0; i < num; i++) >>> - set_devices_ns_access(ns_dev + i, ns_dev[i].val); >>> + set_devices_ns_access(ns_dev[i].ind, ns_dev[i].val); >>> } >>> >>> void enable_layerscape_ns_access(void) @@ -50,20 +50,20 @@ void >>> set_pcie_ns_access(int pcie, u16 val) >>> switch (pcie) { >>> #ifdef CONFIG_PCIE1 >>> case PCIE1: >>> - set_devices_ns_access(&ns_dev[CSU_CSLX_PCIE1], val); >>> - set_devices_ns_access(&ns_dev[CSU_CSLX_PCIE1_IO], val); >>> + set_devices_ns_access(CSU_CSLX_PCIE1, val); >>> + set_devices_ns_access(CSU_CSLX_PCIE1_IO, val); >>> return; >>> #endif >>> #ifdef CONFIG_PCIE2 >>> case PCIE2: >>> - set_devices_ns_access(&ns_dev[CSU_CSLX_PCIE2], val); >>> - set_devices_ns_access(&ns_dev[CSU_CSLX_PCIE2_IO], val); >>> + set_devices_ns_access(CSU_CSLX_PCIE2, val); >>> + set_devices_ns_access(CSU_CSLX_PCIE2_IO, val); >>> return; >>> #endif >>> #ifdef CONFIG_PCIE3 >>> case PCIE3: >>> - set_devices_ns_access(&ns_dev[CSU_CSLX_PCIE3], val); >>> - set_devices_ns_access(&ns_dev[CSU_CSLX_PCIE3_IO], val); >>> + set_devices_ns_access(CSU_CSLX_PCIE3, val); >>> + set_devices_ns_access(CSU_CSLX_PCIE3_IO, val); >>> return; >>> #endif >>> default: >>> diff --git a/include/fsl_csu.h b/include/fsl_csu.h index >>> 8582ac0..027a811 100644 >>> --- a/include/fsl_csu.h >>> +++ b/include/fsl_csu.h >>> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ struct csu_ns_dev { >>> }; >>> >>> void enable_layerscape_ns_access(void); >>> -void set_devices_ns_access(struct csu_ns_dev *ns_dev, u16 val); >>> +void set_devices_ns_access(unsigned long, u16 val); >>> void set_pcie_ns_access(int pcie, u16 val); >>> >>> #endif >>> >> >> Zhiqiang, >> >> Your subject and commit message both say fixing the workaround for >> A010315 but the change is for non-secure access. Did you mismatch them? > > No, this patch is to fix a error of workaround A-010315. > The function set_pcie_ns_access() is wrongly implemented during add > wordaround A-010315. > The structure array ns_dev has a member 'ind' which is initialized by > CSU_CSLX_*, the mistake is I use its member 'ind' as the index of array > ns_dev, actually it should use the 'ind' directly to address the PCIe's CSL > register (CSL_base + CSU_CSLX_PCIE*). > With the current argument list of set_pcie_ns_access(struct csu_ns_dev > *ns_dev, u16 val), it hard to find and set the specified IP block's > non-secure access, so this patch also changed the first argument to the 'ind' > of structure csu_ns_dev. >
Zhiqiang, Thanks for the explanation. I will try to rephase the commit message with the information you provided. York _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot