On 26 July 2017 at 04:40, Philipp Tomsich <philipp.toms...@theobroma-systems.com> wrote: > The ITS file generated warnings due to @<num> designations in the naming > which cause DTC to complain as follows: > Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /images/uboot@1 has a unit name, but no > reg property > Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /images/atf@1 has a unit name, but no > reg property > Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /images/pmu@1 has a unit name, but no > reg property > Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /images/fdt@1 has a unit name, but no > reg property > Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /configurations/conf@1 has a unit name, > but no reg property > > This removes the @<num> part from the names, as we only have a single > image for each payload aspect (and only a single configuration) anyway. > > Signed-off-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.toms...@theobroma-systems.com> > --- > > Changes in v2: None > > board/theobroma-systems/puma_rk3399/fit_spl_atf.its | 18 +++++++++--------- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) >
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
