On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 04:37:11PM +0000, York Sun wrote: > On 07/26/2017 10:56 PM, Ashish Kumar wrote: > > Concatenation of u-boot-spl.bin and u-boot.img for NXP layerscape > > platform SoC: LS1088A/LS2080A and their variants > > > > This patch also depricates UBOOT_BINLOAD in favour of SPL_PAYLOAD > > > > Signed-off-by: Ashish Kumar <ashish.ku...@nxp.com> > > --- > > > > v2: > > This is v2 version of > > https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpatchwork.ozlabs.org%2Fpatch%2F755904%2F&data=01%7C01%7Cyork.sun%40nxp.com%7Cb6406c47c5fb4e535d7808d4d4b428dd%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0&sdata=EcNtJ93vefHWP3po4tX51lG7C6dam%2BTcWRNuoPllSDM%3D&reserved=0 > > > > Also depricate UBOOT_BINLOAD > > > > v3: > > Reverse the logic to check for PowerPC and use .bin > > format else use .img format > > I don't think this changes anything substantially. Checking the arch > maybe not the right thing to do, as pointed by Scott earlier. > > Tom, > > What do you think about this?
Yeah, as I replied again to v2, no, I'm not in agreement with going down this path. I'd need a bit more convincing that there's a good reason to not change things. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
