On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 01:27:17PM +0530, Ashish Kumar wrote: > Concatenation of u-boot-spl.bin and u-boot.img for NXP layerscape > platform SoC: LS1088A/LS2080A and their variants > > This patch also depricates UBOOT_BINLOAD in favour of SPL_PAYLOAD > > Signed-off-by: Ashish Kumar <ashish.ku...@nxp.com> > --- > > v2: > This is v2 version of https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/755904/ > > Also considers recommendation made in following mail chain > http://linux.freescale.net/pipermail/u-boot/2016-September/041592.html > to depricate UBOOT_BINLOAD > > Makefile | 21 ++++++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile > index 4c4c8d8..ff22bda 100644 > --- a/Makefile > +++ b/Makefile > @@ -1030,8 +1030,20 @@ u-boot.dis: u-boot > ifdef CONFIG_TPL > SPL_PAYLOAD := tpl/u-boot-with-tpl.bin > else > +ifeq ($(ARCH),arm) > +ifdef CONFIG_OF_CONTROL > +SPL_PAYLOAD := u-boot-dtb.img > +else > +SPL_PAYLOAD := u-boot.img > +endif #ifdef CONFIG_OF_CONTROL > +else > +ifdef CONFIG_OF_CONTROL > +SPL_PAYLOAD := u-boot-dtb.bin > +else > SPL_PAYLOAD := u-boot.bin
... so you're trying to make the logic such that on ARM we use .img and otherwise we use .bin ? Why are we not using .img everywhere? And I assume your else case is PowerPC, but I'm pretty sure other architectures are currently using .img as well. Thanks! -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
