Dear Heiko,
In message <1242645655326-git-send-email-daniel.gorsulow...@esd.eu> Daniel
Gorsulowski wrote:
> While hard_i2c support is not available
> (see http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-March/049751.html),
> this patch enables soft_i2c on AT91SAM9263 SoC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski <daniel.gorsulow...@esd.eu>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/soft_i2c.c | 5 +++++
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/soft_i2c.c b/drivers/i2c/soft_i2c.c
> index 59883a5..9a48783 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/soft_i2c.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/soft_i2c.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,11 @@
> #include <asm/io.h>
> #include <asm/arch/hardware.h>
> #endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_AT91SAM9263 /* only valid for AT91SAM9263 */
> +#include <asm/arch/at91_pmc.h>
> +#include <asm/arch/gpio.h>
> +#include <asm/arch/io.h>
> +#endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_IXP425 /* only valid for IXP425 */
> #include <asm/arch/ixp425.h>
> #endif
> --
Is there a specific reason this was not applied yet?
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de
It would be illogical to kill without reason
-- Spock, "Journey to Babel", stardate 3842.4
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
