"Robert P. J. Day" <rpj...@crashcourse.ca> writes: > Make it clear to a reader that the user of OMAP34XX macros in the > (OMAP 3530-based) beagle config file is just fine. > > Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpj...@crashcourse.ca> > > --- > > i'll let dirk be the judge as to whether this is worth adding, or if > he'd prefer a different phrasing. > > diff --git a/include/configs/omap3_beagle.h b/include/configs/omap3_beagle.h > index 19a5ec9..9a03587 100644 > --- a/include/configs/omap3_beagle.h > +++ b/include/configs/omap3_beagle.h > @@ -30,6 +30,9 @@ > > /* > * High Level Configuration Options > + * > + * Note that, although the BeagleBoard incorporates an OMAP 3530, > + * it's currently still valid to use OMAP34XX preprocessor values. > */ > #define CONFIG_ARMCORTEXA8 1 /* This is an ARM V7 CPU core */ > #define CONFIG_OMAP 1 /* in a TI OMAP core */
Since 34xx and 35xx are in fact exactly the same silicon, saying it is "currently" valid seems a bit odd. This sort of implies a planned change. -- Måns Rullgård m...@mansr.com _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot