On 5 July 2017 at 23:56, Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Marek, > > On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 1:25 AM, Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote: > > On 06/28/2017 10:28 AM, Bin Meng wrote: > >> Hi Marek, > >> > >> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 7:57 AM, Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> Hi Marek, > >>> > >>> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 2:06 AM, Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote: > >>>> On 06/24/2017 03:53 AM, Bin Meng wrote: > >>>>> Hi Marek, > >>>>> > >>>>> On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 1:59 AM, Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote: > >>>>>> On 06/23/2017 11:54 AM, Bin Meng wrote: > >>>>>>> USB 3.0 hub port status field has different bit positions from 2.0 > >>>>>>> hubs. Since U-Boot only understands the old version, translate the > >>>>>>> new one into the old one. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> This is quite hairy. I'd rather see some protocol version agnostic flag > >>>>>> field rather than patching the wPortStatus and co. > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> I am not sure how do do that in a clean way. If we return the raw 3.0 > >>>>> hub port status data, that means we need change lot of hub codes here > >>>>> and there to do different parsing. > >>>> > >>>> How does Linux handle this? > >>> > >>> Looks Linux is doing different parsing depending on hub is 3.0 or 2.0, > >>> at least for the power bit that I was just looking at. Do you want to > >>> do that? > >> > >> OK, I will do something similar like Linux in v2. > > > > Thanks > > After I checked Linux codes in depth, it looks current way of handling > 3.0 port status translation in this patch is the minimum way to fix > the 3.0 hub port status problem in U-Boot. What Linux does is, one > xHCI controller registers two buses, that one is USB 3.0 and the other > is USB 2.0. All 3.0 devices will only show on the 3.0 bus, while all > 1.0/2.0 devices will show on the 2.0 bus. We can certainly do similar > thing in U-Boot, but I am afraid that will lead to a overhaul to > current USB stack and xHCI driver. And most important, that support > will be only under DM, which is something you don't like to see.
IMO we should not be adding features to non-DM USB. Anyway: Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot