Hi,
On Sat, 1 Jul 2017 15:42:57 -0700 ali...@peloton-tech.com wrote:
> From: Alison Chaiken <ali...@peloton-tech.com>
>
> Make the partition table available for modification by reading it from
> the user-specified device into a linked list. Provide an accessor
> function for command-line testing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alison Chaiken <ali...@peloton-tech.com>
> ---
>
> Changes since v7:
> The failure-handling logic of get_gpt_info() now is triggered
> properly when valid_part=1.
>
> cmd/gpt.c | 119
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/part.h | 7 ++++
> 2 files changed, 126 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/cmd/gpt.c b/cmd/gpt.c
> index 65fb80b..dd5f78b 100644
> --- a/cmd/gpt.c
> +++ b/cmd/gpt.c
[...]
> +static int get_gpt_info(struct blk_desc *dev_desc)
> +{
> + /* start partition numbering at 1, as U-Boot does */
> + int valid_parts = 1, p, ret;
> + disk_partition_t info;
> + struct disk_part *new_disk_part;
> +
> + if (disk_partitions.next == NULL)
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&disk_partitions);
> +
> + for (p = 1; p <= MAX_SEARCH_PARTITIONS; p++) {
> + ret = part_get_info(dev_desc, p, &info);
> + if (ret)
> + continue;
> +
> + new_disk_part = allocate_disk_part(&info, valid_parts);
> + if (IS_ERR(new_disk_part))
> + goto out;
> +
> + list_add_tail(&new_disk_part->list, &disk_partitions);
> + valid_parts++;
> + }
> + if (valid_parts == 1) {
> + printf("** No valid partitions found **\n");
> + goto out;
> + }
> + return --valid_parts;
>
I personally find it somewhat strange to initialize a counter to 1 and
then return its value reduced by one, rather than initializing it to 0
and returning the exact counter value.
Lothar Waßmann
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
