Hi Matthias, On Wednesday 11 November 2009 22:12:06 Matthias Fuchs wrote: > > please pull some updates for "next". Thanks. > > > > > > The following changes since commit > > cd12f615e4dd1dd24caab93f4157894783c6c1c0: Wolfgang Grandegger (1): > > mpc52xx: add support for the IPEK01 board > > > > are available in the git repository at: > > > > git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-ppc4xx.git next > > > > Matthias Fuchs (1): > > ppc4xx: Add UBI support to PLU405 boards > > What happened to the others? ".. init coupler..." etc.
As you know, these patches depend on the sja1000 CAN header: [PATCH 1/2] Add minimal SJA1000 header for basic CAN mode And I'm not sure what the current status of this header is. Wolfgang Grandegger (added to Cc) also introduced some new CAN stuff. We don't want to add multiple headers of course. So how should we continue here? I understand that your patches depending on this sja1000 header are bugfixes: [PATCH 2/2 V3] ppc4xx: Initialize magnetic couplers in PLU405 [PATCH] ppc4xx: Initialize magnetic coupler on VOM405 boards And you introduced this header on the explicit proposal from Wolfgang Denk. So I would vote for adding your bug fix patches with your sja1000 header right now. We should remove this header again, when the CAN support from Wolfgang Grandegger hits mainline. So Wolfgang Denk: Is this ok for you? Should I apply this sja1000 header patch to my repository with the bug fix patches and send a pull request? Cheers, Stefan -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-0 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: off...@denx.de _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
